Category: Uncategorized

  • Jeepers Creepers II

    My score: 7/10. After the first film about this bat-like killer took audiences by storm, in stands to reason a second would be made. This one starts out just before the time the creature will be awakened to eat for a specified period of time. On the farm where it takes place, there are no holds barred in terms of movie craziness.

    Jeepers Creepers II (2003)
    R | 1h 44min | Horror | 29 August 2003 (USA)

    Set a few days after the original, a championship basketball team’s bus is attacked by The Creeper, the winged, flesh-eating terror, on the last day of his 23-day feeding frenzy.
    Director: Victor Salva
    Writers: Victor Salva (characters), Victor Salva
    Stars: Jonathan Breck, Ray Wise, Nicki Aycox

    Steps are being taken by the old man to get ready for the creature’s return. His two sons are getting in fights but they know the severity of what could happen if the creature appears. In fact, they house the creatures remains in their barn and change people to come through and see this urban legend for real. This film is based on the farm this time. There are some appearances of Justin Long’s character either in dreams or ghost form. This is great horror. While not as good as the first in my opinion, it is still highly worth watching. 7/10

  • ‘Ashby’ – Legendary Mickey Rourke as Mentor

    My Rating: 6/10 – Mickey Rourke is an irresistible performer. I’ve been watching his movies since I was a kid and his presence in movies had drawn audiences for years and up to the present day. Is Ashby a welcome presence? Hmmm.

    ashby-poster

    Ashby (2015)
    Cast

    Mickey Rourke, Nat Wolff, Emma Roberts

    Directed by

    Tony McNamara

    Written by

    Tony McNamara

    Other Info

    Comedy, Drama, Romance
    Rated R
    1h 40min

    Ashby is one of those movies you keep questioning whether it’s an independent or major studio motion picture. You think it must suck as the latter and might be hip and cool if it’s the former. Turns out, neither platform can save this film, it comes up empty on several levels.

    The premise is that a High-school student Ed Wallis (Nat Wolff) enters into a friendship with his neighbor, Ashby, (Mickey Rourke) a retired CIA assassin who only has a few months left to live.

    The basic plot bears similarities to Scent of a Woman. The main difference is that Mickey Rourke doesn’t play the role as deftly as Al Pacino. In fact, his character is boring and without charisma. It’s hard to believe we are watching the same Mickey Rourke that kicked ass in Iron Man 2. Maybe he came off as lucid there because he was playing with a thick accent. His character could have been performed much better. The film’s biggest weakness is in him being mis-cast. He’s a great actor and I have huge respect for him. Another film I truly loved him in was The Wrestler. This is not The Wrestler. Unfortunately his performance falls short and almost nonsensical in this film. The romance present in the film can’t save it either. Emma Roberts and Nat Wolff are both charming but the other story overshadows everything and mostly, you want to forget it. I actually chose to watch this film because it was a romance but I think that is another “mis” in the movie along with miscast: a mislabeled.

    It’s a fun idea for a story and for a while, I wanted to see what was going to happen. Soon however I lost interest in the characters and the predictable story unraveling before me. When a high school kid is mentored by an old dude, cool things can happen. I guess the trouble here is that not enough cool things happen. The film weaves a high school film into a hit-man drama with another “coming of age” cord woven in. If each were like seasoning, I’d say each overpowers the other. Nothing is subtle. I’ll be a Mickey Rourke fan to the end but this is not one of his films I can wholeheartedly recommend. I wanted deeper, more rounded characters and a better story. I see what they tried to do but in the end they missed it. It’s not a total bomb so if you are a fan, you may enjoy it because hey … it’s MICKEY ROURKE! Still, Ashby doesn’t pack the punch of some of his other hit films.

  • Peggy Sue Got Married (1986)

    My Rating: 10/10 – I can’t think of anything wrong with this film, it’s one of the perfect ones in my book. About 25 years out of high school, everyone probably thinks a little about what they could have or should have done. This film throws a little sci fi “what-if” into a 25 year high school reunion.

    Peggy Sue Got Married

    “Peggy Sue faints at a high school reunion. When she wakes up, she finds herself in her own past, just before she finished school.” -IMDB

    Cast

    Kathleen Turner Peggy Sue
    Nicolas Cage Charlie Bodell
    Barry Miller Richard Norvik
    Catherine Hicks Carol Heath

    Directed by

    Francis Ford Coppola

    Written by

    Jerry Leichtling, Arlene Sarner

    Other Info

    Comedy, Drama, Fantasy, Romance
    PG-13
    Fri 10 Oct 1986 UTC
    103min
    IMDB Rating: 6.3

    Directed by Francis Ford Coppola (The Godfather saga,  Apocalypse Now, …), is all I need to say to most movie students like myself. He has such an incredible way with people and movies and we see that come across well in this film. They don’t make films like this often and the universe doesn’t see one like Francis Ford Coppola come along often either.

    The staff is similarly charmed. Kathleen Turner plays the lead actress role of Peggy Sue. Watching her is like watching a fine work of art or a ballet dance. She is a talented actress and simply beautiful. Part of her appeal in this film is her humility that belies her beauty. She is one of those beautiful women that can pull it off.

    Nicholas Cage is simply hilarious in this film as Charlie Bodell, Peggy Sue’s boyfriend. He is, by way of trivia, the cousin of the famous director. Cage does a great job as the hate-able yet love-able testosterone filled boy with a dream.  His angst mixed with Peggy Sue’s regrets makes the film an amazing message to all of us. There are other notable performance in this film

    Peggy Sue somehow transports back to high school after a long bout of regret about her choices. While in this dream state (or is it?) she tries to right every wrong she did in her life. She finds out that maybe isn’t possible but that’s what makes life wonderful. It’s imperfect yet beautiful. Humans are imperfect. My favorite line is when her dad buys an Edsel and she says (in her young self body) “Oh dad, you bought an Edsel, your were always dong stuff like that.” Of course the family thinks she crazy.

    FINAL THOUGHTS
    We need more movies like this with a female in the lead role who takes us on a fantastic journey. I am always reminded of an important life lesson every time I watch this film. If for no reason other than the fact that it was made by Francis Ford Coppola, you should see this because it’s about the choices we make and sometime regret. Maybe we shouldn’t regret them after all. See what this inspiring film has to say. I recommend it as a perfect film in its genre. It is quite similar to Back to the Future.

     

  • ‘High Rise’ – Style Over Accessibility

    My Rating: 6/10 – *This review contains spoilers.

    In the future, everyone might live in communal buildings. If you’ve ever lived in a tiny apartment in a big city, you know these can have their drawbacks. This film shows some of those potential problems in the form of a drama. It all looks great but it somehow lost me in its fragmented plot.

    highrise-poster

    High Rise (2015)
    Cast

    Tom Hiddleston, Jeremy Irons, Sienna Miller

    Directed by

    Ben Wheatley

    Written by

    J.G. Ballard (novel), Amy Jump

    Other Info

    Drama
    Rated R
    1h 59min

    Did you “get” this film? Imagine you live, work, swim, workout, shop, and recreate in a London high-rise building. That’s what’s going on here. The cover almost looks like the game “Clue” since it has all the characters posed sardonically as if to say “I could have done it, but I didn’t.” But this isn’t a “whodunnit.” Instead, it’s a drama about things that go on in said high rise. One facet that’s really weird and alluring is the way the futuristic stuff is all retro 70’s looking. It’s like a trip into a sort of “James Bond” land on a movie studio theme park tour. I also reminded me of Ray Bradbury’s writing. He wrote in the 50’s about a future he imagined from 50’s stuff (phones, analog computers, telescreens, monorails). What’s different here is you have a move made in 2016 that portrays a future using 70’s stuff. It really needs to be seen to be understood. I call it futuristic retro.

    Tom Hiddleston plays the main character, Laing. He is the protagonist in the real life novel of the same name by J.G. Ballard. I would assume the novel provided some of the retro visual motivation. The film was directed by Bean Wheatley who is known for Kill List and Sight Seers. He is joined by his wife as screenplay writer on this film once again. Jeremy Irons plays “the architect.” He represents the older gentleman who knows everything about the building. Sienna Miller also stars in the film.

    High-Rise is a story about surviving and thriving in a futuristic high-rise. It’s as much about human technology as it is about its failures. Were people meant to live this closely together? One might decide not after watching this film. Then again, it could be the fault of a few bad applies that spoils it for everyone. When Laing first moves in to the building, I asked myself “Why would he ever need to leave?” There is even a floor that serves as a grocery store. On its face it seems a novel idea, but perhaps we do need to go out from time to time and mingle?

    Luke Evans (known for Dracula) plays a scary Wilder. He is the antagonist and the constant fly in the ointment. At the same time, he was the character I enjoyed watching the most. He bares a similar resemblance to Michael Shannon, who has a similar demeanor as well. It’s impossible to rule out whether a certain person or the faulty plans of the architect pave the way for anarchy in this London high-rise. despite the contained setting, there is sex, violence, vengeance, and science fiction that keeps the plot interesting. By the way, does anyone agree the sex scene was way too long? Is Tom Hiddleston gunning for a new genre here? Unfortunately, the structure and slick look is fragmented. I don’t think I “got it” as I was supposed to.

    Lots of time movies look really slick but I just can’t get into them. It happened with the remake of The Man Called Uncle and some others I reviewed last year. I could probably go back and understand this film better a second time but I probably won’t anytime soon. For the visuals and futuristic/retro ideas, I gave it a 3/5. This is one however that I think will depend a lot on the individual as to whether it’s “gotten” or not. Part of being a “spoilers” reviewer as I am these days is being honest about my gut response. On a gut level, this movie scores lower with me. I try to avoid rating film by my gut so for the look, acting, and structure, I give it 3/5.

  • Murphy’s Romance

    My score: 9/10. Sometimes, the understated films are the best experiences. Some modern romances are arguably too much. They weave in every convention even the ones that are old and overdone. This makes for a wild movie that may be good but doesn’t evoke the inner romantic inside. “Murphy’s Romance” does it.

    Murphy’s Romance (1985)
    PG-13 | 1h 47min | Comedy, Drama, Romance | 31 January 1986 (USA)

    Emma is a divorced woman with a teen-aged son who moves into a small town and tries to make a go of a horse ranch. Murphy is the widowed town druggist who steers business her way. Things … See full summary »
    Director: Martin Ritt
    Writers: Max Schott (based on the novella by), Harriet Frank Jr. (screenplay) | 1 more credit »
    Stars: Sally Field, James Garner, Brian Kerwin

    The director, Martin Ritt has been called one of the best and most sensitive American filmmakers of all time. His movies include: Stanley & Iris, Nuts, Murphy’s Romance, Norma Rae, & Sounder. In 2018, this film does watch a little like a made for tv movie but you have to remember in 1985, a lot of films looked like that. The love story is subtle and it really works.

    You have 2 great talents of film: Sally Field and James Garner. Murphy, played by Gardner, is a local shop owner who apparently is one of the richer citizens of the Arizona town. The town is charming by the way, decorated like a little country town from days gone by. James Garner has a way about him that draws you in. He is truly great, like John Wayne an American classic.

    Sally Field is a marvel to behold. From films like “Norma Rae” to “Gidget,” she captured the heart of America. Her smile is accentuated by her wit and frankly, her attractiveness factor. She adds to any film she’s in and this is another example. The love affair builds slowly and we are drawn in to what is happening as we get to know the two main characters more and more. This would be great for a date night, I recommend it. 9/10.

  • Man on Wire (2008)

    My Rating: 9/10 – Phillipe Petit is the subject of the feature film on this event. This is a different film, a documentary covering the idea to walk on a tightrope across the late World Trade Center. This film is much better than the Hollywood version. It does an amazing job of bringing you into Petit’s world and even onto the wire itself.

    Man on Wire“A look at tightrope walker Philippe Petit’s daring, but illegal, high-wire routine performed between New York City’s World Trade Center’s twin towers in 1974, what some consider, “the artistic crime of the century.”” -IMDB

    Cast

    Philippe Petit Himself
    Jean François Heckel (as Jean-François Heckel) Himself
    Jean-Louis Blondeau Himself
    Annie Allix Herself

    Directed by

    James Marsh

    Written by

    Philippe Petit

    Other Info

    Documentary
    PG-13
    Fri 29 Aug 2008 UTC
    90min
    IMDB Rating: 7.8

    The early part of the film shows Petit practicing his unicycle and wire walking skills in Paris. He knew he was destined to do something amazing with his talents but he didn’t know what. Early on, in a dentist’s office he saw the towers in a magazine and got his inspiration to do it.

    FINAL THOUGHTS

    The best feature of this film is that you get Petit himself talking about why and how he pulled off this feat of art. The amount of work and stealth trickery involved is staggering. It is mindblowing what he was able to do but you keep asking yourself, “why?”

    In comparison to the Hollywood version, this film draws you in to a real event. That’s why this one makes my great 100 list and the Hollywood version does not. The documentary is not perfect in that it does contain a lot of interview footage, and that can get less than exciting if you aren’t really into the topic.

    4/5