Category: Uncategorized

  • Audition

    Listen to this entry from the Damien Riley Podcast:

    If you ever set out to explore foreign horror, you may have stumbled across “Audition” from 1999. It’s a Japanese flick that certainly can be called horror but the large first portion is just drama, building up to a crescendo that is definitely not for weak stomachs.

    Audition (1999)
    Ôdishon (original title)
    R | 1h 55min | Drama, Horror, Mystery | 3 March 2000 (Japan)

    A widower takes an offer to screen girls at a special audition, arranged for him by a friend to find him a new wife. The one he fancies is not who she appears to be after all.
    Director: Takashi Miike
    Writers: Ryû Murakami (novel), Daisuke Tengan (screenplay)
    Stars: Ryo Ishibashi, Eihi Shiina, Tetsu Sawaki

    Director: Takashi Miike has a long list of foreign horror he has made. One I recognized right away was “One Missed Call.” He used a lot of sophisticated camera and editing techniques in “Audition: that make it a great horror film. He is clearly a master of his craft and when I look into Japanese horror again, I’ll be checking out his stuff. But this particular film is well known and respected. It has at 69 on Metascore and you have to take into consideration that it’s a film with subtitles so I see 69 as an excellent American score.

    The main character struck me as a chauvinist who thought himself romantic. The age difference was way too wide. When she started playing into his wiles all to quickly, I was in agreement with his friend that it was probably too good to be true. What happens near the end has been viewed as a victory for feminism because the two men were holding an “audition” for his new wife posing as a casting call. This was made in 1999 but it certainly echoes what has been happening for awareness in Hollywood.

    I did enjoy the first 3/4 of this film but for me, the end was a weak payoff. I enjoy seeing authentic cultural food and architecture and there was a lot of that. Unfortunately, I was looking for a horror the likes of say, “Martyrs” and this is not even in the same universe. The story is more equivalent to a mystery on the CSI tv show. Things get explained with flashbacks etc. Overall, I was not amazed by this film but I’d recommend the drama side of it. The horror is pretty much not there in terms of screentime. I have to give this film a 5/10.

  • Candyman (1992)

    Here we have a cult favorite with underpinnings of a low budget cheap thrill horror movie. Centered around an urban legend where if you say “Candyman” 5 times in the mirror, the characters are killed one by one. Not too cerebral but with a lot of jump scares.

    Candyman

    Candyman

    “The Candyman, a murderous soul with a hook for a hand, is accidentally summoned to reality by a skeptic grad student researching the monster’s myth.” -IMDB

    Cast

    Virginia Madsen Helen Lyle
    Xander Berkeley Trevor Lyle
    Tony Todd The Candyman/Daniel Robitaille
    Kasi Lemmons Bernadette ‘Bernie’ Walsh

    Directed by

    Bernard Rose

    Written by

    Clive Barker, Bernard Rose

    Other Info

    Fantasy, Horror, Thriller
    R
    Fri 16 Oct 1992 UTC
    99min
    IMDB Rating: 6.6

    Kids freak out over urban legends. The idea that a chant in a mirror can summon a killer or a demon or even a product of ones imagination scares the crap out of them, Some people say we are all kids inside no matter our ages. Perhaps that is why this film has become such a cult classic.

    Where I get off the bus is when Virginia Madsen’s character start researching this killer as a supernatural entity. Throughout the 90’s we had slasher films that centered on legend, I Know What You Did Last Summer comes to mind. Perhaps this film tried a bit to hard to weave a scientific basis into it. I think we’ve learned as viewers that the legend need not be explained. Of course, there is always the twist that works well.

    Final Thought:
    Candyman is a gore-filled jump fest that may appeal to pajama party teens. For those of us seeking to see the elements of horror, it grows tiresome wading through the cheap thrills to get to the real stuff that scares us. It’s all there though, I can’t deny that. Don’t expect a dark sense of foreboding but then again not much n the 1990’s produced that good stuff.

    3/5
    3 Stars

  • Wendigo

    A dark tale of a family off course and forced to deal with the “Deliverance” style locals. Those parts we’ve seen before but never with a Wendigo.

    Wendigo (2001)
    R | 1h 31min | Horror, Mystery, Thriller | 23 January 2001 (USA)

    George is a high-strung professional photographer who is starting to unravel from the stress of his work with a Manhattan advertising agency. Needing some time away from the city, Jake, his… See full summary »
    Director: Larry Fessenden
    Writer: Larry Fessenden
    Stars: Patricia Clarkson, Jake Weber, Erik Per Sullivan

    If you’re taken in by creepy and eerie, there’s a lot of that here. Unfortunately, there’s a little too much reliance in the plot on the young son and getting hm tucked in so mom and dad can do the nasty. That threw the story off a bit for me. I mean, it’s like figure ut what you’re trying to make: Malcolm in the middle with a dash of soft porn or a monster movie about the Wendigo. The stuff with the locals was effective, it worked well. Even that though could have been made a bit scarier in my view.

    Lesson learned: don’t piss off the locals when traveling through a forest area. Do I know anything more about what a mythological Wendigo is? Nope.

    5/10

  • Curve

    In the spirit of “The Hitchhiker” this film starts out with a stranger on a lonely road who needs a ride. Even though this one is a burly blonde male model of sorts needing something from the woman driver, it’s a similar thing going on.

    Curve (2015)
    R | 1h 21min | Horror, Thriller | 19 January 2016 (USA)

    A young woman becomes trapped in her car after a hitchhiker causes her to have an automobile accident.
    Director: Iain Softley
    Writers: Kimberly Lofstrom Johnson (story), Kimberly Lofstrom Johnson (screenplay) | 1 more credit »
    Stars: Julianne Hough, Teddy Sears, Penelope Mitchell

    The director is a British guy, Iain Softley, who’s notable works include “KPax.” He does a decent job here setting up the psychological torment of the woman at the hands of this stranger.

    Much of the film takes place in the toppled car. I would imagine this would require a lot of directing. It’s a very physically acted film. Some of the writing could be improved upon, though I enjoyed every minute of this film. As a whole, the end scenes are gratifying, definitely giving us some much earned vengeance play. I would recommend this film as a simple but fun “held captive” film. I give it 7/10.

  • The Shape of Water

    I had a hard time buying the romance between Sally Hawkins’ character and the water creature. After a while, though, I was surprised when it sunk in. Although it’s odd, the romance stuff does work.

    The Shape of Water (2017)
    R | 2h 3min | Adventure, Drama, Fantasy | 22 December 2017 (USA)

    At a top secret research facility in the 1950s, a lonely janitor forms a unique relationship with an amphibious creature that is being held in captivity.
    Director: Guillermo del Toro
    Writers: Guillermo del Toro (screenplay by), Vanessa Taylor (screenplay by) | 1 more credit »
    Stars: Sally Hawkins, Octavia Spencer, Michael Shannon

    The creative sets are deftly made. I was not disappointed with the world put together by Guillermo del Toro. “Pan’s Labyrinth” was where I first saw into his creative genius. In writing, producing, and directing this, he has treated the audience to another world. In a sense he is saying: “I’ve had time to think of this, come on in!”

    The creature is great. His gills slowly fan out like the infamous “Creature from the Black Lagoon.” His eyes look very animal like in a natural sense. I like Michael Shannon’s character for his scariness. You know from the get go he is not there to respect the creature, it seems he wants to destroy it. This is especially evident when the creature bites 2 fingers off. This is one to see in a relaxed frame of mind, expecting little other than fantasic movie art. Is that enough? Maybe not for me really. Still, it’s something worth seeing. Make up your own mind. 6.5/10

  • ‘The Man Who Saved Ben-Hur’

    themanwhosavedbenhurposter
    STARRING: John Alarimo, Rock Hudson, Elizabeth Taylor, Sandra Dee
    DIRECTED BY: Joe Forte
    PRODUCED BY: Joe Forte
    WRITTEN BY: Joe Forte
    GENRE: Biography
    RUNTIME: 54 Min
    YEAR: 2016

    I had a chance to see this film and I must tell you it moved me very deeply. It’s a difficult subject, growing old, but one each of us must face it sooner or later. The “wake-up-call” of this film is that we are all mortal. Questions like, “Who will care about me when I’m old?” resonate throughout the film like pebbles on a lake create ripples. It sticks with you. Because it’s not necessarily about Ben-Hur and rather about the golden age of Hollywood and a man who had a part in making many movies including Ben-Hur, I’m linking to a preview on the movie’s official website. There is also a treasure-trove of never before seen memorabilia, photos, and footage on their site’s page here.

    Johnny-SandraDeeHere’s how I saw it: A man who worked in the golden age of Hollywood as an actor, singer, and director looks back on his life with his younger film-making 2nd cousin, Joe Forte. He reminisces and shares a lot of memorabilia he has accumulated through the years. There is a story he tells about how he, in essence, saved Ben-Hur when it was at a weak point but the main idea of the movie is not that, it’s about the impending sunset on all of our lives. This makes for a highly emotional, though at times “hand-held cam, slow-paced” film. It would be a great movie to see with a loved one and then get coffee after to talk about this highly taboo topic. What will become of us when the curtains of our lives close?

    I think we all need to consider what worth our lives have.  My only criticism of this film is its title, I feel people will miss the point. It’s a film about aging gracefully and about the hard truths that go along with that. The Ben-Hur moments are few and far bewtween. Still, that is his calling card and legend if-you-will, so in that way, it makes a little more sense. At any rate, that’s the reason it lost a star with me. The other 4/5 I mean sincerely, this is a fine film on an important subject.

    Johnny at home_02Even a huge film like Ben-Hur needed real people to make it work. But what happens when the director goes home and the actors are left to go to doctor appointments and such, try to make peace with old age? This film takes us soberly down that path. The memorabilia shown throughout the film along with stories from the golden age of Hollywood make it enjoyable. Other than that it is a theme as important as it is difficult to think about. The memorabilia and stories from this man ease the hard truth of aging. He brings the audience awareness of the past and the present which is priceless if we’re hoping to live in the now. I recommend this one. Here are some more photos from the film:

    There are many ways to see this film. They are linked on the film’s official website: Watch & Purchase.

    Explore more about the film through its website and social media:

    www.manwhosavedbenhur.com

     Facebook:/manwhosavedbenhur

    Twitter: @savedbenhur

    Instagram: #manwhosavedbenhur